• From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>
• To: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>,xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 09:56:04 -0500

>> We're using MSVC 6 here, and basic_string<> seems fine. 
>
>It's not.  See eg.
>	http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/stl/faq.htm#Q4

Actually, it is fine.  I ran the test program from that faq in the debugger
(stepping thru all the template code), and they clearly fixed this problem
in the transition from VC5 to VC6.

-Joshua Smith


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: "even simpler" C++ XML parser for object hierarchies
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: "even simpler" C++ XML parser for object hierarchies
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread