Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 02:17 PM 12/23/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote: >There are a lot of answers to this question, but in the end, the real >argument was that PIs cause display problems in level-3 and level-4 >HTML browsers, and some influential parties [1] had a strong interest >in being able to write HTML+XML documents that, by various sorts of >lexical trickery, could still be displayed in XML-oblivious browsers >like Netscape 3. > >Yes, I know everything you're going to say, and I probably agree with >all of it. I've written a couple of Namespace filters, and they'd be >*much* easier if all Namespace declarations appeared in the prolog. And here I thought it was that processing instructions give the W3C a mysterious rash. Good to know, though! Happy Holidays, all! Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
