• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: Paul Miller <stele@f...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:36:08 +0700

Paul Miller wrote:

> The only way I could have done that
> and keep the sub-element parsing model that I want is to have expat
> parse entire document into one big internal memory buffer.

How so?  You can layer a next event style interface on top of expat by
maintaining a queue of events.  A request for the next event returns the
head of the queue; if the queue is empty, it fills the queue by reading
another chunk of input and passing it to XML_Parse() with event handlers
that append to the queue of events.

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@m...>

• References:
  • XML parsing memory overhead concerns
    • From: Paul Miller <stele@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread