[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>>>>> "Jeff Greif" <jmg@t...>: > I think this problem usually can be managed by choice of include > path, assuming you have source code for the SAX library. If the > include directory for the ObjectSpace headers is found before the > include directory for MSCVC++ standard library when you compile both > the SAX library and application code, the problem with broken parts > of the MSVC++ library version of iostream should be avoided. But > this approach does not work if you want to use someone else's binary > of the library. No, this is not the problem. The problem is that Standards<ToolKit> does not work with the standard C++ library iostream implementation of MSVC++. This implementation is in the std:: namespace. Instead it works with the old iostreams which are _not_ in the std:: namespace. Ie. if I use std::istream, I get the incompatible iostreams. The problem can _maybe_ be solved by ditching Standards<ToolKit> in favour of the STLport version of SGI STL. But suggesting to my coworkers that I spend time on this, when the current Standards<ToolKit> setup is working, would be met with incomprehension. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



