• From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 03 Dec 1999 12:09:00 +0000

Walter> Walter Underwood <URL:mailto:wunder@i...>

0> In article <3.0.5.32.19991202135858.00ac6100@c...>,
0> Walter wrote:

Walter> HTML has a robots meta tag.  XML has no standard way to
Walter> declare the same information.  Here is a proposal, with an
Walter> implementation:
Walter>
Walter>   <URL:http://homepages.go.com/%7Ewunder0/robots-pi.html>
Walter>
Walter> Comments are welcome.

It may be an idea to provide a NOTATION identifier for the processing
instruction, rather than binding it to the specific word "robots".  It
depends on the trade-off you want to make between implementor convenience
and author generality.  If you've thought about it and decided against,
it's probably worth a comment in your proposal explaining your rationale.

-- 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A processing instruction for robots
    • From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>

• References:
  • A processing instruction for robots
    • From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
• Previous by thread: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by thread: Re: A processing instruction for robots
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread