[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: 30 Oct 1999 07:09:55 -0500

"Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...> writes:

> I think the important thing to remember about RDF is that it is not XML. It
> is fundamentally an abstract model for expressing metadata. It happens to be
> representable using XML, but it is different from XML. Unfortunately, this
> distinction is part of what makes the spec hard to read, but it's important.

That's a good point, and it's important to remember that it applies to
almost *everything* that can be represented in XML.  Even traditional
document types like HTML or DocBook really have their own model (hence
the HTML DOM).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member