• From: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 14:54:43 +0900

At 10:01 AM -0500 99.12.22, David Megginson wrote:
> Since we're implementing SAX2 in a new package anyway, I'm interested
> in hearing suggestions for renaming DTDHandler so that the name more
> accurately describes its purpose (reporting notation and unparsed
> entity declarations).  Here are some ideas off the top of my head:

How about simply calling NotationDeclHandler or UnparsedEntityHandler?

I think both describe the purpose of the interface reasonably well, since
notation and unparsed entity declarations are almost always used together.

--
Jun Fujisawa
<mailto:fujisawa@t...>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX2: Renaming DTDHandler
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Next by Date: Re: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Previous by thread: SAX2: Renaming DTDHandler
• Next by thread: SAX2: NamespaceDeclHandler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread