• From: "Robert Hanson" <rhanson@b...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 13:57:54 -0500

When I say "XSL" I don't mean "XSLT" or "XPath", but instead the XSL spec
itself.  Looking at an article on XML.com today which was written in May of
this year, Michael Leventhal wrote a rather convincing piece saying that XSL
is not needed, and maybe he is right (at least partially).  And looking at
what has happened since he wrote it, it seems that XSLT moved on without
XSL... So what happened?  Will there ever be an XSL?

Thanks, and happy new year.

Robert



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Next by Date: RE: What happened to XSL?
• Previous by thread: RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Next by thread: RE: No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread