• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: <Daniel.Veillard@w...>
• Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 11:21:14 -0500

Hi Daniel,

Daniel said:
 the question can be reversed:
   - how well can we map Xlink to RDF model ?

There will be a attempt to answer the second question in the next XLink
draft (to be made public real soon),

Didier reply:
I think you're right, Xlink should be mapped to RDF. I look forward reading
the xlink draft to see how this can be made.

I will post the question to the RDF mailing list to see if this can feed RDF
2 to bring us such facilities. Let's cross our fingers that it will ;-).

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences:Web New York (http://www.mfweb.com)
Book to come soon: XML Pro published by Wrox Press
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A bit of synergy this morning?
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XML parsing memory overhead concerns (fwd)
• Previous by thread: Re: A bit of synergy this morning?
• Next by thread: XML Schema: New Public Working drafts available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread