• From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 10:28:55 +0700

Paul Miller wrote:
> 
> I don't think it is, but I want to check. I'd like to be able to reuse
> an XML_Parser after I've called XML_Parse with isFinal set to 1.
> Basically I want to go back and parse a subset of the original file,
> using modified starting buffer pointer and length, but it doesn't seem
> to work (I get a JUNK_AFTER_DOC_ELEMENT error). I would like to avoid
> creating a new parser for each element subtree I scan.

Expat doesn't support that.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • expat meant to be restartable?
    • From: Paul Miller <stele@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: simple XML for C++ application data-file I/O
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Previous by thread: expat meant to be restartable?
• Next by thread: simple DOM-style XML parser, in C++?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread