• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 03 Dec 1999 12:38:02 +0100

>>>>> James Clark <jjc@j...>:

> One interesting issue is whether to provide a virtual destructor.  I
> think the safest solution is not to provide a virtual destructor but
> instead to declare but not define a private operator delete.  This
> makes it a compile time error to do:

>   DTDHandler *p;
>   // ...
>   delete p;

Hm... not defining a virtual destructor for a class with virtual
functions gives me warnings in "gcc -Wall".  Will a private operator
delete do anything about these warnings, I wonder...?

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• References:
  • SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/C++: Changes for C++
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
• Previous by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: XML Query Engine
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread