[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Stephen T. Mohr" wrote: > > People who have built parsers claim the alleged complexity of XML isn't a > problem for them *as XML stands*. Not having built one of my own, I'll take > their word for it. Then why do most XML parsers: a. choose to exclude an arbitrary set of features e.g. PIs, external entities etc.? b. consistently fail conformity tests? This is the foundation on which a huge superstructure is rapidly being built willy-nilly. Philip -- Philip Nye Engineering Arts 72 Herberton Road ~ Bournemouth BH6 5HZ ~ UK tel +44 (0)1202 418236 ~ fax +44 (0)1202 418676 mailto:philipnye@f... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



