• From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@m...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 03:03:21 -0500 (EST)

On 10 Dec 1999, David Megginson wrote:
> No, these would both be non-conformant -- the XML spec defines a
> document as the main production, and a parser that encounters a second 
> root element in what is being given to it as a document simply has to
> stop processing, except for error reporting.

Yes.  But I thought the computational model for XML was 
a hedge-automata? (not a tree-automata... )

Clark


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Appending to an XML document
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Appending to an XML document
• Next by Date: DOM Level 2 bumped up to Candidate Recommendation
• Previous by thread: Re: Appending to an XML document
• Next by thread: RE: Appending to an XML document
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread