• From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 00:33:11 -0500

At 09:20 PM 11/28/1999 -0500, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:
>[...]
>The XML that is most important is the XML that can't be seen...

We are finding that just the opposite is true.  Both the technical and the business savvy are designing DTDs, and both the technical and the business savvy fully expect to be able to see the XML.

Ergo, simplicity is extremely important and ideally a requirement.
--
Joe Lapp              (Looking for some good people to help design
Senior Engineer        and build the Internet's business-to-business
webMethods, Inc.       XML infrastructure.  We are 100% Java.)
jlapp@w...           http://www.webMethods.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>

• References:
  • RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
  • RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>

• Prev by Date: A call for reason
• Next by Date: RE: [SML] Mapping between SML and XML
• Previous by thread: RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by thread: RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread