• From: "Michael Champion" <mike.champion@s...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 09:56:07 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: <rev-bob@g...>
To: <xml-dev@i...>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 6:50 AM
Subject: re: RE: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?



> > I just do not see the point of offering both hex and decimal.
> > Convenience doesn't fly since writer might be used to hex and
> > the reader might be used to decimal.
>
> Funny - that's exactly why convenience DOES fly.  If I'm used to hex and
you're used to
> decimal, doesn't it make sense to allow both?  It's a trivial conversion
that makes for a
> lot more ease for users - allowing both is a no-brainer

I agree with Don here.  Accomodating the coder's convenience in the language
itself is the first step on the road to another SGML.  A higher level tool
or API can easily handle the conversion, so put it there, not in the parser.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • re: RE: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
    • From: rev-bob@g...

• Prev by Date: Re: RSS and WAP - another RSS question
• Next by Date: Entities - dec, hex, or both?
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
• Next by thread: Announce: Weblog Monitor and XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread