• From: "Nik O" <niko@c...>
• To: "- XML-Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 11:41:34 -0700

Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
>If we wanted to be really up-to-the-minute, we could follow
>the usage of logicians and use U+22A4 (DOWN TACK)
>and U+22A5 (DOWN TACK) as the canonical values [...]

Why not use U+22A8 (TRUE) and U+22AD (NOT TRUE)?  I don't know how
logicians/mathematicians use these, but presumably they are used enough that
the Unicode org described them.

There would be no confusion with the Roman letter "T", and
"pi(e)-on-the-side" is one of the seven true paths to happiness, que no?

Regards,
 Nik O, Teton Data Systems, Jackson, Wyo.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why do we write standards?
• Next by Date: Good stuff on XHTML modularization
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schema and international Booleans
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema and international Booleans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread