• From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 14:16:11 -0800

Not to rouse the fitfully sleeping namespace beast, but I can't get it out
of my mind. In particular, I have a dumb question:

If the namespace facility designers were adamant that a namespace identifier
doesn't necessarily point to any actual schema, then why did they use URI's
as namespace "targets". The whole notion of URI implies that there's
something (i.e., the resource) out there. But a namespace is not inherently
a pointer (regardless of whether you can access the thing pointed to). Why
not just make namespace targets ordinary XML names?

Jeff Sussna


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URI's in namespaces
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: URI's in namespaces
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • Re: URI's in namespaces
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Linking a XML document to its schema
• Next by Date: Re: URI's in namespaces
• Previous by thread: program to restore end tags?
• Next by thread: Re: URI's in namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread