• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 21:59:55 -0500

> As folk have pointed out, pointy brackets aren't 
> "fundamentally necessary" and LISP S-Expressions are
> _at least_ as powerful ... with a much richer
> and more powerful set of programming systems and traditions 
> behind them.

Yes... I gave this example in a seminar recently, and that comes
directly from my experience implementing a distributed hypermedia
system that used s-expressions for generic markup.

> So a "fundamentally necessary" argument is not at all 
> convincing to me.

Not to me either.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Feeling good about SML
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML One expert panel now playing on TechNetCast
• Next by Date: RE: What do XML consultants actually do?
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread