• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 15:29:07 -0600

Warren Hedley wrote:
> 
> Hi Gregg
> 
> I faced the same problem as you 6 months ago (actually, I'm just
> ignoring it now), and had a look at the docbook DTD but found it
> too vast and complicated to follow initially. I ended up cutting
> out just the bibliography section for inclusion into my own DTDs.

Good approach.  Question: is it a valid subset?  Will any instance that 
parses by this definition parse with the original?

How should an XML DTD designer signify that this DTD is a 
conformant subset or a variant of a another DTD?  Are 
these one, two, or three namespaces IF a namespace identifier 
resolves to a schema?  This matters if the FPI is ROA for the 
DTD and a label for the namespace identifier.

len


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bibiography dtd?
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>

• References:
  • bibiography dtd?
    • From: "Reynolds, Gregg" <greynolds@d...>
  • Re: bibiography dtd?
    • From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: bibiography dtd?
• Next by Date: RE: bibiography dtd?
• Previous by thread: Re: bibiography dtd?
• Next by thread: Re: bibiography dtd?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread