• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• To: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 20:30:54 -0500

Don Park wrote:

> I don't see much difference between zero and one (one?:) namespace
> and since there is definite need for a namespace (i.e. XSL) to
> distinguish (X)HTML tags from others, I prefer one over zero.

XSL currently handles HTML, text, and XML 1.0 output without need for any
specified namespace in either the input or the output.

/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• References:
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread