• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 15:31:32 -0500

From: <uche.ogbuji@f...>
[many snips...]
>
> To some minds, and for some purposes, procedural approaches are awkward:
in
> other cases declarative approaches are awkward, but if one had to pick one
> with intrinsically less "awkwardness" for XML-processing, I would argue
for
> the declarative approach.
>
> --
 Let us remember, SQL is not procedural, and it is in widespread use.  (Of
course, current SQL is not well suited for hierarchical nesting of many or
an unknown number of levels).

Tom Passin


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A Plea for Schemas
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Client detection
• Next by Date: Does anybody know why ?
• Previous by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread