• From: "Anton Schoultz - ePOS" <antons@e...>
• To: "XML-DEV LIST" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 08:47:44 +0200

Hi All,

Thanks for the input on the two questions I posed a few days back.

Re:Q1 - short answer NO
I will stick to single document type per exchange (i.e. only invoice(s) /
only payment(s) etc).

Re:Q2
For those fragments (such as address, email, date etc etc ) that are common
across my document types I'll probably define the fragment in it's own DTD
file, and then go with the ENTITY definition as outlined by Liam Quin [Sun
1999/10/31 09:30] to 'include' them in the required documents

Thanks again
Anton


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by Date: a newbie question
• Previous by thread: XRS: XML retrieval engine is downloadable
• Next by thread: a newbie question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread