• From: "Frank Richards" <frichards@p...>
• To: "'Patrice Bonhomme'" <Patrice.Bonhomme@l...>,<xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:10:02 -0500

> >I am looking for some position papers that are doing a comparison of both
> >relational model and object oriented approaches for XML database
> conception.
>

Poet Software (for whom I peddle content management systems) has a white
paper at
http://www.poet.com/products/oss/white_papers/rel_vs_obj/rel_vs_obj.html
explaining why OODBMS (especially Poet's) are a better fit for XML.

Frank Richards
Poet Software
frichards@p...


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Database: position papers ?
    • From: "KenNorth" <KenNorth@e...>

• Prev by Date: [SML]My opinion - Leaving out attributes
• Next by Date: XFM (or something similar)
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Database: position papers ?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Database: position papers ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread