• From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@w...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 18:58:21 -0500

At 04:06 PM 11/28/1999 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
>[...]
>The main issue is that if combining characters are allowed
>to be first in a name, then they will attach to the <
>character instead of standing alone, by Unicode rules.

Ah, so that's why.  But why should SML enforce these rules?
Why doesn't Unicode disallow it?  Why did XML go this route?

I'm all for the simplification.  It's hell on performance
to have to make those checks for every character read.
--
Joe Lapp              (Looking for some good people to help design
Senior Engineer        and build the Internet's business-to-business
webMethods, Inc.       XML infrastructure.  We are 100% Java.)
jlapp@w...           http://www.webMethods.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • [SML] i18n Name support?
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
  • Re: [SML] i18n Name support?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
• Next by Date: Re: [SML] Preliminary EBNF v0.2
• Previous by thread: Re: [SML] i18n Name support?
• Next by thread: [SML] Preliminary EBNF v0.2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread