• From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 08:40:45 +0000

[Don Park]
>
>SML is a subset in the sense that it meets the
>external parsed entity requirements, XML fragments
>in other words.
>

As a consequence, no XML 1.0 parser can be used
out-of-the box to parse SML. Ugh!

I think this one crosses the rubicon. I have
high hopes for SML. *Please* make is truly
a subset of XML 1.0.

>>If I have understood you right then this
>>blows it for me I'm afraid:-(
>
>Sorry about that.
>
Likewise.

regards,




<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML
    • From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
  • RE: [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by Date: RE: [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML
• Previous by thread: RE: [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML
• Next by thread: Re: [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread