• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 08:58:40 -0800

>It would be simple enough to append logEntry elements to 
>whatever.log and
>then, when you need to process it as a valid XML document, to 
>process this:
>
>  <!DOCTYPE myLog [
>  <!ELEMENT myLog (logEntry+)>
>  <!-- declare logEntry, etc. -->
>  <!ENTITY logfile SYSTEM "whatever.log">
>  ]>
>  <myLog>&logfile;</myLog>
>
>I would consider this an obvious use of a basic XML feature (external
>general entities); is this what you meant by "XML hack"?

Yes, Bob.  'Obvious' is rather arguable.

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: APIs vs Markup
    • From: "DuCharme, Robert" <DuCharmR@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by Date: datatypes and i18n
• Previous by thread: RE: APIs vs Markup
• Next by thread: Re: Separating documents in a stream
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread