• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 17:16:19 +0100

Michael Champion wrote:
> 
> I agreee with everything else here, but I believe the exact opposite is
> true:  The vast majority of XML client seats supporting XSL use IE5, and Web
> publishers use the IE5 "technology preview" flavor of XSL as a de-facto
> standard.
>
> I hope I'm wrong ... but if so, what *do* this vast majority of users use?

Server-side XSL or none at all. I don't think I've ever browsed a web
page that used client-side XSL *EXCEPT* as an explicitly highlighted
demo (read "experiment").

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
"Like most religious texts, the XML 1.0 spec has proven itself 
internally-inconsistent, so we're going to have to invent some kind of 
exegetical method now to show how it's really all an allegory." - Anon

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
  • Re: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML)
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft, XML, and the real specs
• Previous by thread: Re: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
• Next by thread: Re: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread