Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Dave Winer wrote: >> >>Yes yes yes!! >> >>That would get XML into the minds of HTML coders and would start a process >>for other applications of XML to take off. >> >>Dave After ranting on application profiles, etc. I wanted to clarify that it doesn't seem to be necessary to get an answer to application profiles for XHTML to be useful. Application profiles would be a useful thing to have resolved for other XML applications, but doesn't seem necessary for XHTML 1.0. The three namespaces thing seemed to be adding a feature to XHTML 1.0 that HTML 4.01 did not have. As a new feature, it should have probably been reserved for XHTML 1.1 or whatever. Namespace free XHTML would be fine with me. However, if XHTML must deal with application profiles, I'd like it to establish a pattern that other xml applications could follow. However, I think that is better left to the schema group (and maybe to XML Schema 1.1) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
