• From: William Lindsey <lindsey@d...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 10:48:11 -0700 (MST)

 (regarding name characters)

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Don Park wrote:

> Net result is that SML data will be well-formed but invalid
> name error will not be reported.  Is this too much to ask?

Yes, it is too much to ask.

Your SML data may be well-formed by some idea you have of
the meaning of the term, but the XML spec has a different, 
more precise definition of "well-formed".   A 
conforming XML processor is required to reject a
document with illegal element names. That document
is, therefore, not XML.

"Close" isn't good enough.

Cheers,
Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: A call for reason
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: DTD.com - new repository
• Next by Date: Re: A call for reason
• Previous by thread: RE: A call for reason
• Next by thread: Re: A call for reason
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread