• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 16:19:23 -0500

> There might be a case for keeping ID and IDREF, for
> example, as a minimal mechanism for linking inside a
> document, but many of the features of XML (notably
> entities) are pretty complex in their
> own right. An architecture that does away with these, significantly
> reducing the complexity of implementing "vanilla" XML, and requires
> implementation of (say) an additional XLink layer for
> applications that need to create references between documents, would seem
to me
> to provide more, not less interoperability.

Only if people also implement XLink.... and XLink
itself is far from trivial.

In an ideal world, we'd have XML, XSLT, XLink, and maybe a
few others supported in all tools. The reality is that this
will likely never happen.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Handheld computers
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by Date: RE: [SML] Numeric character references
• Previous by thread: Re: Handheld computers
• Next by thread: Re: Handheld computers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread