• From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 10:05:34 -0800 (PST)

On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Tim Bray wrote:

> In terms of actual usability, there's effectively no difference between
> UTF-16 and UTF-8.  UTF-16 seems to be an easier sell in Japan for reasons
> that I've not fully understood.

Could that have something to do with the fact that Japanese characters
require two octets in UTF-16 and three in UTF-8?



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Announce: IBM XSL Editor
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...?
• Previous by thread: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread