• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'Richard Anderson'" <rja@a...>, "'Rick Jelliffe'" <ricko@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:02:06 -0500

> > I hope that future APIs could keep this in mind: hide the
> > encoding from the processor by all means, but save the encoding
information for
> > re-encoding later.
>
> Yes.  I'd go further and say the processor should have the
> option to see the encoding.

Perhaps in something like the SAX API, there would be some of this
information passed along... it is useful information for many things.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: HERE's why the world needs a simpler XML! [was Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)]
• Next by Date: Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Previous by thread: Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
• Next by thread: Re: Is the XML decl a PI ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread