• From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 10:54:09 +0100

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> I like where this is going - but it changes 'a plea for schemas' to 'a plea
> for a discovery mechanism for information about XML documents'.  I think
> you've got the right idea here, a way to keep the open approach of the
> BizTalk schema repository without the baggage of the BizTalk framework and
> its owners.  Instead of the centrally adjudicated process, we get an open
> system for describing information that can be distributed rather than
> centralized.

How about a plea for both schemas and an associated discovery mechanism?
The former is clearly a prerequisite for the latter.

Matthew

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A Plea for Schemas
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: A Plea for Schemas
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML for trade finance
• Next by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by thread: RE: A Plea for Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread