Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>Excellent point, and I'll take that as a call to change the >approach. Instead of starting from first principles to >identify the 'simple' subset, we probably ought to empirically >identify the 'simple' subset predominantly now in use. Joe, I like this line of thinking and would like to see it progress further. Result should hopefully be a list of firmer goals/requirements. Everyone who are interested in SML are here mainly because of its relationship to XML. SML discussions have been drifting somewhat away from XML so I would like to see if this thread will help us get back to the original intent: SML is a subset of XML. Lately, I have been trying to gain a different perspective by thinking what if SML was here first and XML was actually SML 2.0? This line of thinking adds a rather interesting appreciation of attributes. I hope you don't mind if I stay back in the background for a while to observe because I found it rather difficult to see things objectively while trading blows at the frontline. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
