Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Don Park wrote: > We clearly have a need to delve deeper into XML fragments related > issues and I believe this is one of them. > > In my view, sometimes it makes sense for a particular XML fragment > to specify constraints on its containers. By its nature, a fragment > is likely to be missing some information (parameters if you will) that > must be provided by the context. We currently have no mechanism to do > this but we will need it eventually. Mark Birbeck replied: >Not true - XML Fragment Interchange suggests a simple way to >do all that you say. I know that current thinking is that there's 'too >many specs to read', but this one's a teeny one.> Mark, I think you misinterpreted the XML Fragment Interchange spec. It suggest a way to provide context information about a fragment of an existing document. I was talking about some means to specify and constrain where a standalone fragment (meaning that it is not a complete document and is also not part of another document) may be used and what context information is needed to use it. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
