• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 17 Nov 1999 09:30:02 +0100

>>>>> "Don Park" <donpark@d...>:

> I was born in Korea so I appreciate your position.  However, your
> opposition of SML is based on the assumption that SML will only
> support UTF-8.  The list of SML features is preliminary and,
> personally, I do not mind seeing SML support both UTF-8 and UTF-16
> although not necessarily at the same time since the application
> might require either encoding but not both.

Er... AFAIK you can represent the exactly the same characters in UTF-8
and UTF-16, since both are transformation formats of the full 32 bit
Unicode.  Maybe I'm missing something here...?

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Feeling good about SML
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parser compliance
• Next by Date: Creating XMLDocument
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread