• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 15:58:10 -0800

Paul,

I think we should wrap up this thread here (with a Duck Tape :).

<IMHO>
There is zero chance of the three line spec happening whether it
makes sense or not.  There is also zero chance of us convincing
each other one way another.  It would have been a nice continuing
conversation piece over drinks but I can't send liquior through
XML-DEV's attachment restrictions.  Oh, well.
</IMHO>

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why do we write standards?
• Next by Date: `server parsed' XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by thread: can anyone help?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread