• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• To: "xml" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 20:02:10 -0500

David Megginson wrote:

> Further to this point, the members' responses to the director are
> confidential -- even those of us on W3C committees don't get to see
> them -- but from what some members have told me unofficially, an XHTML
> spec with zero Namespaces will not be any more successful than an
> XHTML spec with three.

Well that settles that, doesn't it?  

:)

/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by Date: WML vs. XHTML
• Previous by thread: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread