• From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 15:36:47 -0800

>>Would it not save everyone a lot of anguish if XHTML 1.0 were just HTML
4.01
recast as XML 1.0, in other words without mentioning namespaces *at all*,
and
saving the namespace stuff for future versions (if it's proven to be
viable)?

Yes yes yes!!

That would get XML into the minds of HTML coders and would start a process
for other applications of XML to take off.

Dave


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
    • From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by Date: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread