• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:46:37 GMT

> Not allowing ¤ means:
> 
> 1. SML parsers will have to check for it which
>    complicates implementation.
> 
> 2. SML spec will have to explain it which
>    complicates the spec.
> 
> For above two reasons, I do think ¤ should
> be allowed.

It seems I could replace " ¤" by "attributes" in the above.

David

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: [SML][LONG]Why i don't like SML [was: Re: sml without...
• Next by Date: RE: Use cases for XML failure (was Re: #2 Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?)
• Previous by thread: RE: [SML]
• Next by thread: RE: A call for reason, another go [SML et al]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread