• From: Michael.Orr@D...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:14:08 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Lanyon [mailto:rgl@d...]
> Subject: RE: Feeling good about SML
> 
> 
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote:
> 
> > > For arguments sake, lets call this the XML Feature Manifest
> > > (XMF).
> 
> > This seems like an excellent suggestion...  much better than
> > inventing another language, and besides, the XFM would be
> > great input into the SML analysis process.
> 
> I'd just like to add my support too! I think this is a great idea.

I wholeheartedly agree with this. 

Regards,
Mike

----------------------------------------
Michael Orr, CTO, VP R&D
Design Intelligence Inc, Seattle WA USA
http://www.design-intelligence.com



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: Re: documenting schemas/DTDs
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread