• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• Date: 14 Nov 1999 17:39:27 -0500

"Richard Anderson" <rja@a...> writes:

> Given the spec says PItargets starting with xml are reserved for
> standazation in this or future versions of the spec, I'd personally say it
> should be considered a PI with special meaning, why else reserve the
> characters in the PI declartion ?

For xml-stylesheet, etc.  An earlier version of the Namespaces in XML
spec used a processing instruction xml-namespace.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • RE: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Separating documents in a stream
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>
  • Is the XML decl a PI ?
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why do we write standards?
• Next by Date: RE: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
• Previous by thread: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
• Next by thread: RE: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread