• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:32:15 -0800

At 01:21 PM 11/9/99 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> ... external parsed entities are evil ...
>
>Bringing morality into it seems ... irrelevant, extremist.

Well, I'm with Eliot.  XML would be altogether better if we'd just
bagged external parsed entities.  All repeat all the corner cases that
I know of are right here.  In particular, since in the history of SGML,
the number of tools that actually did useful things with them was very
small, we have no excuse.  Oh well. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Next by Date: RE: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Previous by thread: RE: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Next by thread: Re: external parsed entites (was: A unique ID question ?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread