[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew@p...>
  • To: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@l...>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 10:58:13 +0200

> Many places (including the university where I work) would probably switch to
> a URN based system of tracking resources tomorrow, *if* Navigator and
> IE both supported URN resolution.  Occassionally when stricken with fever
> I consider going to work for Microsoft just to get URN resolution incorporated
> in
> to the damned browsers.....

If you are happy with a Microsoft-only solution, you could use
asynchronous pluggable protocols
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/networking/pluggable/pluggable.asp)
as an alternative to moving to Redmond. (I assuming that you have some
code for resolving the URNs and are just looking for a way to integrate
this into the browser.) For Netscape, of course, you just need to
download, modify and build the Mozilla sources. ;-) Ease of
extensibility is one of the reasons that Microsoft won the browser wars.

Matthew

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member