• From: Mike Hatalski <mhatalski@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 16:05:37 -0700

How about IBM's Translator Generator?
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/aw.nsf/techmain/5F60964153C4274788256776006817
AA

--Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
<snip/>
To me, it sounds like you could do with some tools for mapping different
data structures that represent similar underlying data structures to a
common model.  The problem isn't that XML is too flexible; rather, it's
that no one has yet built something handy for making "everyone else's
representation" into "my representation". It doesn't seem like a light
project, but it doesn't seem impossible, either.

It'd get you out of:
a) having to define all your models in advance
b) forcing everyone to use identical representations

I wish I had more time, I really do.  Anybody else done something like this?

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Next by Date: Re: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Previous by thread: RE: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Next by thread: Re: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread