Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> writes:
> Next question... do any XML parsers support URNs? Do they use these
> resolution protocols?
Hmm -- this sounds like a really good candidate for a SAX conformance
test. Make up an XML document that references a URN, then implement
an EntityResolver that maps the URN to a URL that actually points to
something.
SAX parsers shouldn't choke on this (even if they know nothing about
URNs), but I'm not willing to bet too much: I think that AElfred might
be OK, and James almost certain does it right in XT.
> URNs feel a lot like FPIs to me in terms of their resolvability and lack of
> infrastructure thereof, and I often wonder if they really belong mixed with
> URLs. Oh well.
Yeah, there's been a lot of discussion on this point. By the way, do
we have any usable URN schemes yet?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
