• From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:54:32 +0100 (BST)

On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Henrik wrote:

> How about XSLT ?

We have a white paper comparing XML Script and XSL(T) on our website:
http://www.xmlscript.org/xsl.html
Without wishing to start a flame war, it seems to me that XSL's roots in
stylesheet languages mean that some sorts of programming are unecessarily
awkward. It's difficult to be objective about ease-of-use in different
programming languages, especially when you're better acquainted with one
than another, but I personally find XSL's declarative syntax rather
unwieldy. YMMV.

-- 
Richard Lanyon (Software Engineer) |     "The medium is the message"
XML Script development,            |             - Marshall McLuhan
DecisionSoft Ltd.                  |




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Sv: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
    • From: "Henrik" <webdev@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Next by Date: Re: DTD tools
• Previous by thread: Sv: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Next by thread: Re: Dissillusioned about interoperability.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread