Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> I (and I think some other people) are becoming increasingly convinced
> that the need for some sort of an "XML Packaging" facility is becoming
> increasingly urgent. I was asked to write up a motivating statement for
> the XML Plenary meeting that is happening this Wednesday. I thought that
> the xml-deviants might also find it of interest.
>
> It's at http://www.textuality.com/xml/why-pkg.html -Tim
I agree. For all the reasons you gave which are... reasonable.
Historical aside:
That would get us almost back to the level of SGML
when the CALS fellows worked out the 9600 tape formats for
packaging documents and Charles was working on the *strange
name that was the box japanese meals came in* standard.
But:
"Graphics
In raster (PNG, GIF, JPG) and vector (SVG, VML, PGML) formats. "
Include X3D. Coming along nicely now. Sure do want to see
real time 3D animations of the deep namespaces.
len
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
