• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 16:57:22 +0100

Simon St.Laurent wrote,
> URNs are an acceptable part of the URI spec, but XML 
> processors may have no way to resolve them to actual 
> resources.  What should a validating parser do when 
> confronted by:
>
> <!DOCTYPE myDoc SYSTEM "urn:itsSoObvious">

Exactly the same as what it would do if confronted by

 <!DOCTYPE myDoc SYSTEM "http://foo.bar.com/itsSoObvious">

if it had no way of resolving an http URI to an actual
resouce: report an error.

Given that not many XML processors have URN resolution 
support at the mo', I guess this means the combination of 
URNs for DTDs + validation isn't a very good idea (yet).

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin@c...           England

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: URNs in SYSTEM declarations
• Next by Date: Re: URNs in SYSTEM declarations
• Previous by thread: Re: URNs in SYSTEM declarations
• Next by thread: RE: URNs in SYSTEM declarations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread