• From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:49:56 -0700

I agree that attributes are an unfortunate and unnecessary redundancy in
XML. I was not that wrong-headed guy from Microsoft, but if I knew who it
was, I would agree with him. BTW, a very interesting discussion is happening
over on the XML-RPC DG. It's not an exact replay of the discussions we had
last year. Dave


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
    • From: "John Tigue" <john.tigue@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread